Peter Williams <pwil3058@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Please then try the latest ACPI patch here: > > http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/patches/release/2.6.13/acpi-20050902-2.6.13.diff.gz > > It should apply to vanilla 2.6.13 with a reject in ia64/Kconfig > > that you can ignore. > > > > If this works, then we munged git-acpi.patch in 2.6.13-mm1 somehow. > > There were no problems with this patch applied. So it looks like the > munge theory is correct. That diff is significantly different from the diff I plucked from master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git#test for 2.6.13-mm1. Doing (patch -R | grep FAILED) on 2.6.13-mm1 says: Hunk #3 FAILED at 356. 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file arch/ia64/Kconfig.rej Hunk #6 FAILED at 190. Hunk #8 FAILED at 221. Hunk #10 FAILED at 254. Hunk #11 FAILED at 357. Hunk #15 FAILED at 474. Hunk #17 FAILED at 569. 6 out of 17 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/acpi/dispatcher/dsmethod.c.rej Hunk #19 FAILED at 468. Hunk #29 FAILED at 701. 2 out of 38 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/acpi/dispatcher/dswload.c.rej Hunk #14 FAILED at 321. Hunk #43 FAILED at 1159. 2 out of 44 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/acpi/osl.c.rej Hunk #17 FAILED at 1134. 1 out of 18 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/acpi/parser/psparse.c.rej Hunk #3 FAILED at 74. 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/acpi/parser/psxface.c.rej Hunk #1 FAILED at 35. 1 out of 15 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/acpi/pci_bind.c.rej Hunk #5 FAILED at 220. Hunk #15 FAILED at 412. Hunk #16 FAILED at 425. Hunk #17 FAILED at 446. Hunk #19 FAILED at 484. 5 out of 36 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/acpi/processor_core.c.rej Hunk #1 FAILED at 41. Hunk #2 FAILED at 71. Hunk #4 FAILED at -55. Hunk #5 FAILED at 30. Hunk #6 FAILED at 40. Hunk #7 FAILED at 69. Hunk #9 FAILED at 317. Hunk #10 FAILED at 344. Hunk #12 FAILED at 289. Hunk #14 FAILED at 523. Hunk #15 FAILED at 607. Hunk #16 FAILED at 618. Hunk #17 FAILED at 645. Hunk #19 FAILED at 534. Hunk #20 FAILED at 686. Hunk #22 FAILED at 916. Hunk #23 FAILED at 968. Hunk #25 FAILED at 881. Hunk #26 FAILED at 891. Hunk #29 FAILED at 953. 20 out of 29 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/acpi/resources/rsaddr.c.rej Hunk #11 FAILED at 289. Hunk #16 FAILED at 407. Hunk #17 FAILED at 425. Hunk #18 FAILED at 434. Hunk #20 FAILED at 470. Hunk #21 FAILED at 527. 6 out of 21 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/acpi/resources/rsirq.c.rej Hunk #27 FAILED at 553. 1 out of 61 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/acpi/scan.c.rej Hunk #1 FAILED at 41. 1 out of 34 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/acpi/utilities/utmisc.c.rej Hunk #5 FAILED at 291. 1 out of 76 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/acpi/video.c.rej Hunk #2 FAILED at 64. 1 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/acpi/acconfig.h.rej Hunk #1 FAILED at 41. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/acpi/acdispat.h.rej Hunk #29 FAILED at 1078. Hunk #30 FAILED at 1240. 2 out of 31 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/acpi/actypes.h.rej - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
