James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 10:05 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > yeah ... cannot remember why i have done it originally :-| > > > Might it be to do with sizeof(task_struct.comm)? > > But that's 16 bytes not 10; Well we stick a "/%d" at the end, which gets us up to 14 chars, assuming NR_CPUS < 1000 > and anyway, it doesn't have to be unique; > set_task_comm just does a strlcpy from the name, so it will be truncated > (same as for a binary with > 15 character name). Yup. But it'd be fairly silly to go adding the /%d, only to have it truncated off again. We could truncate the name before adding the CPU number, but it sounds saner to just prevent anyone passing in excessively long names. Via BUG_ON, say ;) What's the actual problem? - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
