On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 08:52:31AM +0300, Kai Makisara wrote: > On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 09:16:27PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > > On Gwe, 2005-04-29 at 05:20, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > Ok thats the bit I needed to know > > > > > > > > So, do you still object to this patch being accepted? > > > > > > Switched to CAP_SYS_RAWIO I don't. Its the wrong answer long term I > > > suspect but its definitely a good answer for now. > > > > Switch it in both capable() calls in the patch? Kai, is this acceptable > > to you also? > > > Yes. Using CAP_SYS_ADMIN here was wrong. Ok, care to send a new patch that I can use for the next -stable kernel release? thanks, greg k-h - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
