On 26/02/2025 08:21, Sangwook Shin wrote: > From: Kyunghwan Seo <khwan.seo@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Fix the PMU register bits for the ExynosAutoV920 SoC. > This SoC has different bit information compared to its previous > version, ExynosAutoV9, and we have made the necessary adjustments. > > rst_stat_bit: > - ExynosAutoV920 cl0 : 0 > - ExynosAutoV920 cl1 : 1 > > cnt_en_bit: > - ExynosAutoV920 cl0 : 8 > - ExynosAutoV920 cl1 : 8 > > Signed-off-by: Kyunghwan Seo <khwan.seo@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Sangwook Shin <sw617.shin@xxxxxxxxxxx> Resending while ignoring all previous emails, so we should do the work twice. If you ever wonder why your patches are not applied, you got answer. <form letter> This is a friendly reminder during the review process. It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it. If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation: Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is "received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the version they apply. Please read: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577 If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed. </form letter> Best regards, Krzysztof
