On 2/11/25 12:05 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 11/02/2025 13:02, André Draszik wrote:
>> Hi Tudor,
>>
>> On Tue, 2025-02-11 at 11:57 +0000, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>>> And then I shall s/MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");/MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");/
>>> everywhere as "GPL" indicates [GNU Public License v2 or later].
>>
>> No, please don't, see Documentation/process/license-rules.rst.
Indeed, thanks, Andre'! The tag shouldn't convey the detailed license
information, as the only decision to be made is whether the module is
free software or not. I'll keep MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> For the rest of suggestions here I also recommend rereading docs. I
always a good suggestion :)
> don't get why we need to change "GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause", but maybe I
I reread the docs, LICENSES/preferred/GPL-2.0 says that:
'''
For 'GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2 only' use:
SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
or
SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
```
the two are equivalent. The downstream driver uses "GPL-2.0-only". I
think it'd be good that everything that I derived from it to have the
same SPDX value, for consistency reasons.
Thus I'll amend the license on the bindings file and on
include/linux/firmware/samsung/exynos-acpm-protocol.h only.
I'm not thrilled about a new version for such a small change, but I
think it's worth it.
Thanks,
ta
