On 12/3/24 12:06, André Draszik wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-12-03 at 11:30 +0100, Thomas Antoine wrote:
>> Should I explicitly deny their use in the code for the max77759 or is it
>> just for information?
> I'd probably do something like this, which will indeed deny their reading
> and/or writing, both via debugfs, and also normal driver access via
> readmap_read()/write() etc:
>
> static const struct regmap_range max77759_registers[] = {
> regmap_reg_range(0x00, 0x4f),
> regmap_reg_range(0xb0, 0xbf),
> regmap_reg_range(0xd0, 0xd0),
> regmap_reg_range(0xdc, 0xdf),
> regmap_reg_range(0xfb, 0xfb),
> regmap_reg_range(0xff, 0xff),
> };
>
> static const struct regmap_range max77759_ro_registers[] = {
> regmap_reg_range(0x3d, 0x3d),
> regmap_reg_range(0xfb, 0xfb),
> regmap_reg_range(0xff, 0xff),
> };
>
> static const struct regmap_access_table max77759_write_table = {
> .yes_ranges = max77759_registers,
> .n_yes_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(max77759_registers),
> .no_ranges = max77759_ro_registers,
> .n_no_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(max77759_ro_registers),
> };
>
> static const struct regmap_access_table max77759_rd_table = {
> .yes_ranges = max77759_registers,
> .n_yes_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(max77759_registers),
> };
>
> static const struct regmap_config max77759_regmap_config = {
> .reg_bits = 8,
> .val_bits = 8,
> .max_register = 0xff,
> .wr_table = &max77759_write_table,
> .rd_table = &max77759_rd_table,
> .cache_type = REGCACHE_NONE,
> };
>
> And maybe without cache for now. Most are probably not cacheable anyway.
Thank you very much, I'll try this out.
Best regards,
Thomas
