On Wed, 2024-09-25 at 20:05 +0000, Kaustabh Chakraborty wrote: > On 2024-09-25 19:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 25/09/2024 21:36, Kaustabh Chakraborty wrote: > > > On 2024-09-25 19:25, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > > On 25/09/2024 20:42, Kaustabh Chakraborty wrote: > > > > > On 2024-09-20 12:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > > > > On 19/09/2024 17:20, Kaustabh Chakraborty wrote: > > > > > > > Add the compatible string of Exynos7870 to the existing list. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kaustabh Chakraborty <kauschluss@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > > > ... and the DTS is <please provide lore ink in changelog>? > > > > > > > > > > Didn't quite understand. The patch adds the compatible string > > > > > for Exynos7870 DECON in documentation. There's no DTS involved > > > > > in here, right? > > > > > > > > Provide lore link to the DTS submission. > > > > > > There aren't any DTS submissions *yet* which use the compatible. > > > Is that an issue? > > > > > > > Yeah, users are supposed to be upstream. Not downstream. > > I understand that. I had plans to submit it in the future. > If that's how it's meant to be done, I'll have to revisit this > submission at a later date then. Hi, may I ask for reason that you don't submit dts? I am asking because I wonder if there is an issue related to DPP. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-samsung-soc/2e4d3d180f535e57d9cb98e7bac1d14b51ffc5d4.camel@xxxxxxxxx/#t Best regards, kwang. > > > > > Best regards, > > Krzysztof
