On 16/08/2024 16:25, Artur Weber wrote: > > > On 16.08.2024 11:54, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 16/08/2024 10:19, Artur Weber wrote: >>> @@ -732,6 +794,15 @@ static int max77693_charger_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >>> chg->dev = &pdev->dev; >>> chg->max77693 = max77693; >>> >>> + psy_cfg.drv_data = chg; >>> + >>> + chg->charger = devm_power_supply_register(&pdev->dev, >>> + &max77693_charger_desc, >>> + &psy_cfg); >>> + if (IS_ERR(chg->charger)) >>> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(chg->charger), >>> + "failed: power supply register\n"); >> >> This code move is not explained in the commit msg. At least I could not >> find it. Please explain why you need it in the commit msg. > > This is done because the call to power_supply_get_battery_info in > max77693_dt_init requires chg->charger to be set. (I was considering > putting this in the commit message, can't remember why I didn't do it. > I'll add it in the next version.) I think that's wrong. Power supply is being available to the system before it is being configured. Best regards, Krzysztof