Hi Andy,
Am Donnerstag, 6. Juni 2024, 18:09:32 CEST schrieb Andy Shevchenko:
> Let the kememdup_array() take care about multiplication and possible
> overflows.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-cpu.c | 5 ++---
> drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c | 8 ++++----
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-cpu.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-cpu.c
> index 6ea7fba9f9e5..398a226ad34e 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-cpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-cpu.c
> @@ -369,9 +369,8 @@ struct clk *rockchip_clk_register_cpuclk(const char *name,
>
> if (nrates > 0) {
> cpuclk->rate_count = nrates;
> - cpuclk->rate_table = kmemdup(rates,
> - sizeof(*rates) * nrates,
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> + cpuclk->rate_table = kmemdup_array(rates, nrates, sizeof(*rates),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
are you sure the param order is correct?
According to [0], it's (src, element_size, count, gfp), while above
(and below) element_size and count seems switched in the
kmemdup_array calls.
Heiko
[0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/mm/util.c#n149
> if (!cpuclk->rate_table) {
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> goto unregister_notifier;
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
> index 2d42eb628926..606ce5458f54 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
> @@ -1136,10 +1136,10 @@ struct clk *rockchip_clk_register_pll(struct rockchip_clk_provider *ctx,
> len++;
>
> pll->rate_count = len;
> - pll->rate_table = kmemdup(rate_table,
> - pll->rate_count *
> - sizeof(struct rockchip_pll_rate_table),
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> + pll->rate_table = kmemdup_array(rate_table,
> + pll->rate_count,
> + sizeof(*pll->rate_table),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> WARN(!pll->rate_table,
> "%s: could not allocate rate table for %s\n",
> __func__, name);
>
