Mon, May 13, 2024 at 01:59:03PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven kirjoitti:
> On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 3:14 PM Peng Fan (OSS) <peng.fan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...
> You missed one trivial conversion, presumably because no error handling
> and thus no of_node_put() is involved?
Nothing is missed. The below is a redundant change.
...
> - for_each_child_of_node(np, child) {
> + for_each_child_of_node_scoped(np, child) {
> if (of_property_count_u32_elems(child, RZN1_PINS_PROP) > 0)
> count++;
> }
>
> If you prefer not to include this
I prefer this not to be included as it will give a misleading signals to the
use of the original API(s).
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
