On 07/05/2024 22:43, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2024-05-06 22:54:10) >> On 07/05/2024 01:44, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>> Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2024-05-04 05:06:22) >>>> The following changes since commit 4cece764965020c22cff7665b18a012006359095: >>>> >>>> Linux 6.9-rc1 (2024-03-24 14:10:05 -0700) >>>> >>>> are available in the Git repository at: >>>> >>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git tags/samsung-clk-6.10 >>> >>> I'm getting compile warnings. Is there a pending fix? Also, why is GS101 >> >> I don't see any of these warnings. Neither local (W=1), nor on my CI, >> nor reported by LKP (which reported build successes for this branch). >> How can I reproduce it? > > I ran this command > > make W=1 ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi- drivers/clk/samsung/clk-gs101.o > > and I see the warnings. They're actually upgraded to errors. So regular W=1 build... weird. > >> >> >>> describing clk parents with strings instead of using clk_parent_data? >> >> GS101 uses existing Samsuung clock framework, so that's how it is done >> there. There is nothing odd here, comparing to other Samsung clocks. > > Ok. Is anyone working on migrating Samsung clk drivers to the non-string > way? I am not aware of it. There was no serious development for Samsung SoC in total for years. > >> >>> >>> In file included from drivers/clk/samsung/clk-gs101.c:16: >>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-gs101.c:2616:7: error: ‘mout_hsi2_mmc_card_p’ >>> defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=] >>> 2616 | PNAME(mout_hsi2_mmc_card_p) = { "fout_shared2_pll", "fout_shared3_pll", >> >> I see indeed some unused variables and I will drop them but your >> warnings are not reproducible. > > Weird! I use gcc-12.2 if that helps. I've been meaning to upgrade but I > also don't see much urgency. > > I'll wait for the next PR. Yes, patch is already in linux-next, so I'll wait a bit and send today. Best regards, Krzysztof