On 5/3/24 09:31, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 03/05/2024 10:24, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On Fri, 03 May 2024, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/05/2024 10:08, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 5/3/24 08:21, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> .../bindings/mfd/samsung,s2mpa01.yaml | 2 +-
>>>>> .../bindings/mfd/samsung,s2mps11.yaml | 12 ++---
>>>>> .../bindings/mfd/samsung,s5m8767.yaml | 4 +-
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> So this should be Ack. You cannot review part of the patch ("I have
>>> carried out a technical review of this patch...").
>>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8-rc5/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
>>
>> Reviewed-by is totally appropriate here.
>
> Submitting patches is clear on that:
> "A Reviewed-by tag is a statement of opinion that the patch is an"
> Not "the patch or part of patch"
>
> And ack:
> " It is a record that the acker has at least reviewed the patch ....
> Acked-by: does not necessarily indicate acknowledgement of the entire
> patch."
>
> So no, reviewing part of the patch means you Ack it. Especially that in
> git log the Rb tag will suggest entire patch was reviewed, while it was
> not true. Review of 80% of patch did not happen.
Thanks, Krzysztof, I'll keep in mind next time. I now confirm I went
through all the substitutions and they look good to me. R-b now applies
to all the changes.
ta
