On 02/05/2024 09:03, Tudor Ambarus wrote: >> We might have to add a driver for these clocks, but in the meantime >> let's just ensure they stay on even if siblings are turned off. > > It's sane, yes. > >> >> For the avoidance of doubt: This commit doesn't mean that we can boot >> with clk_ignore_unused. >> > > s/with/without. Because there are still other clocks that are not yet > handled/marked as critical where needed. There's still work to do. > > With the typo addressed: Thanks, applied with fix above. Best regards, Krzysztof
