On 4/15/24 19:41, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 at 20:15, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 12:05 PM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 11:52 AM Dmitry Baryshkov
<dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 at 16:46, Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 05:28:51PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
[..]
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm2290.dtsi | 2 +-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdu1000.dtsi | 2 +-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi | 2 +-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdx75.dtsi | 2 +-
Acked-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Note, we'd need to override PMU compatibles in sdm636.dtsi and
sdm660.dtsi. Ideally it should come as the same patch.
Uh, that's an A for reuse, but an F for readability... It's sdm632 as
well. Will drop sdm630.
Actually, aren't those Kryo cores just Cortex-A53 derivatives? So the
A53 PMU compatible is an improvement over the generic one still. We
can't just add kryo260-pmu compatibles because that breaks
compatibility. We could have a fallback, but then that introduces a
pattern we don't want.
I think it is believed that Gold cores are A73-derivatives.
8xA53 on 630
4xA53+4xA73 on 636/660
Konrad
