On 4/13/24 09:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 28/03/2024 13:34, Tudor Ambarus wrote: >> v3: >> - update first patch: >> - remove __nMUX() as it duplicated __MUX() with an exception on flags. >> - update commit message >> - update comment and say that nMUX() shall be used where MUX reparenting >> on clock rate chage is allowed >> - collect R-b, A-b tags >> > > Sorry for late response, somehow this end up deep in inbox. You no worries! > reference some non existing commits, so I think you do not work on > mainline trees. Ah, the horror, you're right, I messed up the fixes reference in commit 2. It's because I started working on this before that patch got integrated. Would be good to extend checkpatch to catch such situations. > > Also Fixes must come before other patches, so probably first patch > should be squashed with second. Otherwise second patch is not a complete > fix. I don't mind squashing them. I noticed a tag that might help in this situations: "Depends-on:". But I guess we can't use that in the same patch set as when the maintainer applies the dependency and adds its S-o-b tag, it will modify the sha1 of the commit. Will squash them. Cheers, ta
