On Wed, Apr 10, 2024, Anand Moon wrote: > Hi Thinh, > > On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 07:24, Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 04, 2024, Anand Moon wrote: > > > Use the new PM macros for the suspend and resume functions to be > > > automatically dropped by the compiler when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP are disabled, > > > without having to use #ifdef guards. If CONFIG_PM_SLEEP unused, > > > they will simply be discarded by the compiler. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@xxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > v2: add __maybe_unused to suspend/resume functions in case CONFIG_PM is > > > disabled. > > > > The compiler discards the code, yet we still need __maybe_unused? > > > Earlier version had not added this since but I removed the > guard.CONFIG_PM_SLEEP. > added __maybe_unused just to safeguard the function. > > I have tried to build with config by disabling CONFIG_PM and CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > but could get the warning compilation by adding flag W=1 > -Werror=unused-function. > <snip> > > But since these CONFIG_PM and CONFIG_PM_SLEEP cannot be disabled, > I am not getting any warning related to these functions. > > Do you want me to remove __maybe_unused ? > The warning was there as expected. You should to use it along with DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(). Let me know if you still see the same warning. BR, Thinh
