Hi Krzysztof, Greg.
On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 at 19:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 04/04/2024 15:52, Anand Moon wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 at 18:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 12:43:17PM +0530, Anand Moon wrote:
> >>> The devm_clk_get_enabled() helpers:
> >>> - call devm_clk_get()
> >>> - call clk_prepare_enable() and register what is needed in order to
> >>> call clk_disable_unprepare() when needed, as a managed resource.
> >>>
> >>> This simplifies the code and avoids the calls to clk_disable_unprepare().
> >>>
> >>> While at it, use dev_err_probe consistently, and use its return value
> >>> to return the error code.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>> V2: drop the clk_disable_unprepare in suspend/resume functions
> >>> fix the usb_put_hcd return before the devm_clk_get_enabled
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c | 19 +++++--------------
> >>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c
> >>> index f644b131cc0b..f00bfd0b13dc 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c
> >>> @@ -159,20 +159,15 @@ static int exynos_ehci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>>
> >>> err = exynos_ehci_get_phy(&pdev->dev, exynos_ehci);
> >>> if (err)
> >>> - goto fail_clk;
> >>> -
> >>> - exynos_ehci->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "usbhost");
> >>> + goto fail_io;
> >>>
> >>> + exynos_ehci->clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(&pdev->dev, "usbhost");
> >>> if (IS_ERR(exynos_ehci->clk)) {
> >>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get usbhost clock\n");
> >>> - err = PTR_ERR(exynos_ehci->clk);
> >>> - goto fail_clk;
> >>> + usb_put_hcd(hcd);
> >>> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(exynos_ehci->clk),
> >>> + "Failed to get usbhost clock\n");
> >>
> >> Why is this logic changed?
> >>
> >> If you want to call dev_err_probe(), that's great, but do NOT mix it up
> >> with a commit that does something totally different.
> >>
> >> When you say something like "while at it" in a changelog text, that is a
> >> HUGE hint that it needs to be a separate commit. Because of that reason
> >> alone, I can't take these, you know better :(
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >>
> >
> > Ok, I will improve the commit message relevant to the code changes.
>
> Please read Greg's message one more time. He did not propose to fix
> commit msg, right?
>
Ok I will drop dev_err_probe and keep the error flow as it is.
It will not break the feature..
Thanks
-Anand
