Hi Rob > This is resend v2 of replace of_graph_get_next_endpoint() > > We should get rid of or minimize of_graph_get_next_endpoint() in > its current form. In general, drivers should be asking for a specific > port number because their function is fixed in the binding. > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131184347.GA1906672-robh@xxxxxxxxxx > > This patch-set replace of_graph_get_next_endpoint() by > of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs(). There are still next_endpoint() > after this patch-set, but it will be replaced by > for_each_endpoint_of_node() in next patch-set (A) > > [*] this patch-set > [o] done > > [o] tidyup of_graph_get_endpoint_count() > [*] replace endpoint func - use endpoint_by_regs() > (A) [ ] replace endpoint func - use for_each() > [ ] rename endpoint func to device_endpoint > [ ] add new port function > [ ] add new endpont function > [ ] remove of_graph_get_next_device_endpoint() > > v1 -> v2 > - add Reviewed-by from Launrent > - use by_regs(xx, -1, -1) for some devices > - add extra explain for drm_of_get_dsi_bus() > - add FIXME and Link on adv7604.c > - based on latest of branch > > Kuninori Morimoto (4): > gpu: drm: replace of_graph_get_next_endpoint() > media: i2c: replace of_graph_get_next_endpoint() > media: platform: replace of_graph_get_next_endpoint() > video: fbdev: replace of_graph_get_next_endpoint() I wonder who should handle this patch-set ?? I'm posting these as part of "of patch-set" (= to Rob) but does these should be handled by each driver maintainer ? (I believe all maintainers are listed on To) Thank you for your help !! Best regards --- Renesas Electronics Ph.D. Kuninori Morimoto
