There is already a pointer to the pwmchip, make use of it directly
instead of using the struct samsung_pwm_chip *our_chip just obtained
from it. This also has the advantage of not using struct
samsung_pwm_chip::chip any more which will be dropped soon.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
index 6e77302f7368..0f9a2a5e3ebc 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
@@ -326,12 +326,12 @@ static int __pwm_samsung_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
period = NSEC_PER_SEC / period_ns;
- dev_dbg(our_chip->chip.dev, "duty_ns=%d, period_ns=%d (%u)\n",
+ dev_dbg(chip->dev, "duty_ns=%d, period_ns=%d (%u)\n",
duty_ns, period_ns, period);
tin_rate = pwm_samsung_calc_tin(our_chip, pwm->hwpwm, period);
- dev_dbg(our_chip->chip.dev, "tin_rate=%lu\n", tin_rate);
+ dev_dbg(chip->dev, "tin_rate=%lu\n", tin_rate);
tin_ns = NSEC_PER_SEC / tin_rate;
tcnt = period_ns / tin_ns;
@@ -355,8 +355,7 @@ static int __pwm_samsung_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
/* -1UL will give 100% duty. */
--tcmp;
- dev_dbg(our_chip->chip.dev,
- "tin_ns=%u, tcmp=%u/%u\n", tin_ns, tcmp, tcnt);
+ dev_dbg(chip->dev, "tin_ns=%u, tcmp=%u/%u\n", tin_ns, tcmp, tcnt);
/* Update PWM registers. */
writel(tcnt, our_chip->base + REG_TCNTB(pwm->hwpwm));
@@ -368,7 +367,7 @@ static int __pwm_samsung_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
* shortly afer this update (before it autoreloaded the new values).
*/
if (oldtcmp == (u32) -1) {
- dev_dbg(our_chip->chip.dev, "Forcing manual update");
+ dev_dbg(chip->dev, "Forcing manual update");
pwm_samsung_manual_update(our_chip, pwm);
}
--
2.43.0
