On 12/02/2024 12:52, André Draszik wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-02-12 at 12:40 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 12/02/2024 12:30, André Draszik wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2024-02-12 at 12:18 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> I can drop it, but the actual problem is that what if downstream keeps
>>>> changing aliases? They can do it...
>>>
>>> We won't care at that stage, downstream should have no reason to divert from
>>> upstream for numbering at some point in the future.
>>
>> What do you mean by "no reason"? The reason is they can do whatever they
>> want. Some project leader says: "I want this" and they will do it. They
>> won't care about our upstream choice at all.
>>
>> And then what, you change it again?
>
> As I said above, we won't care if downstream changes again at that stage, so
> no, I wouldn't plan on changing again.
Then I am lost. What stage are you thinking? What differs between now
and let's say 1 month for the GS101 which was released more than three
years ago?
BTW, the aliases I see in downstream DTS (gs101-usi.dtsi) - since
beginning up to Android 14 are:
hsi2c8 = &hsi2c_8;
hsi2c9 = &hsi2c_9;
hsi2c10 = &hsi2c_10;
hsi2c11 = &hsi2c_11;
hsi2c12 = &hsi2c_12;
They were set like this in 2020 and never changed afterwards.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
