Re: [PATCH 5/5] clk: samsung: gs101: don't mark non-essential clocks as critical

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 1/30/24 09:31, André Draszik wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-01-29 at 13:16 -0600, Sam Protsenko wrote:
>> That sounds reasonable. But I wonder if that bit (about making this
>> clock CLK_IS_CRITICAL to make earlycon functional) can be documented
>> somewhere. Perhaps in the serial driver (earlycon function), or
>> somewhere in device tree bindings? Because otherwise it might remain
>> an arcane knowledge and people won't be able to use earlycon later.
>> Anyways, for this patch:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> and if you think it makes sense to document the bit above, please do.
> 
> Will do on top of
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240119104526.1221243-6-tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxx/
> once that is in.
> 
It was applied, it's in linux-next. I like the dt bindings idea, it's
the first thing I check when dealing with new hardware. No idea though
how to add comments just for a specific compatible. Shall be a
description somewhere...




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]    
  • [Linux on Unisoc (RDA Micro) SoCs]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  •   Powered by Linux