On 1/23/24 19:28, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 9:34 AM Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Add missing blank line after declaration. Move initialization in the
>> body of the function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
>> index f5474f3b3920..2abf5994080a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
>> @@ -1273,8 +1273,9 @@ static int s3c64xx_spi_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> {
>> struct spi_controller *host = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd = spi_controller_get_devdata(host);
>> + int ret;
>>
>> - int ret = spi_controller_suspend(host);
>> + ret = spi_controller_suspend(host);
>
> Why not just moving the empty line below the declaration block,
> keeping the initialization on the variable declaration line?
>
just a matter of personal preference. I find it ugly to do an
initialization at variable declaration and then to immediately check the
return value in the body of the function. But I'll do as you say, just
cosmetics anyway.
