On 04/01/2024 11:38, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> Hi Viresh,
>
> On 12/26/23 05:12, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 20-12-23, 11:03, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>>> There are device drivers which can modify voltage values for OPPs. It
>>> could be due to the chip binning and those drivers have specific chip
>>> knowledge about this. This adjustment can happen after Energy Model is
>>> registered, thus EM can have stale data about power.
>>>
>>> Introduce new API function which can be used by device driver which
>>> adjusted the voltage for OPPs. The implementation takes care about
>>> calculating needed internal details in the new EM table ('cost' field).
>>> It plugs in the new EM table to the framework so other subsystems would
>>> use the correct data.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/opp/of.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> include/linux/pm_opp.h | 6 ++++
>>> 2 files changed, 75 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/opp/of.c b/drivers/opp/of.c
>>> index 81fa27599d58..992434c0b711 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/opp/of.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/opp/of.c
>>> @@ -1596,3 +1596,72 @@ int dev_pm_opp_of_register_em(struct device
>>> *dev, struct cpumask *cpus)
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_of_register_em);
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * dev_pm_opp_of_update_em() - Update Energy Model with new power
>>> values
>>> + * @dev : Device for which an Energy Model has to be registered
>>> + *
>>> + * This uses the "dynamic-power-coefficient" devicetree property to
>>> calculate
>>> + * power values for EM. It uses the new adjusted voltage values
>>> known for OPPs
>>> + * which have changed after boot.
>>> + */
>>> +int dev_pm_opp_of_update_em(struct device *dev)
>>
>> I don't see anything OPP or OF related in this function, I don't think
>> it needs
>> to be part of the OPP core. You just want to reuse _get_power() I
>> guess, which
>> can be exported then.
>>
>> This should really be part of the EM core instead.
>>
>
> Thank you for having a look at this. OK, that makes sense.
> When I finish the EM runtime modification core features and get them
> merged, I'll continue to work on this patch set. I'll try to follow
> your comment here and export that function (with a different name
> probably).
Just to make sure: If this is the case then you could also add
em_dev_compute_costs() with this new patch instead providing it with the
'Introduce runtime modifiable Energy Model' patch-set?
This would keep dev_pm_opp_of_update_em() and em_dev_compute_costs()
together. IIRC, all the other new EM interfaces you already use with
your 'modifiable EM' use case: '[PATCH v5 14/23] PM: EM: Support late
CPUs booting and capacity adjustment'.
