On 03/12/2023 21:25, Dragan Simic wrote: >> +Order of Properties in Device Node >> +---------------------------------- >> + >> +The following order of properties in device nodes is preferred: >> + >> +1. compatible >> +2. reg >> +3. ranges >> +4. Standard/common properties (defined by common bindings, e.g. >> without >> + vendor-prefixes) >> +5. Vendor-specific properties >> +6. status (if applicable) >> +7. Child nodes, where each node is preceded with a blank line > > Another small suggestion... It would be good to put the property names > found in the list items, such as "compatible" and "status", into > quotation marks, to make it obvious what they are. That way, the list > would also be more consistent with the property names mentioned in the > sentence right below. If there is going to be new version, I'll implement it. Otherwise it is pickiness over style, not content essence. Best regards, Krzysztof
