On 24/10/2023 16:55, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 07:27:50PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 03:29:35PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>> On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 23:02:29 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>>>> Fixes: 4c9548d24c0d ("pwm: samsung: Put per-channel data into driver data")
>>>
>>> Applied, thanks!
>>>
>>> [1/1] pwm: samsung: Document new member .channel in struct samsung_pwm_chip
>>> commit: 4bb36d126cb3147d6bbfd00242a5b846dacad595
>>
>> You might want to change 4c9548d24c0d to e3fe982b2e4e now that you
>> rewrote your for-next branch.
>
> This is still open. I wonder there is no automated check that warns if
> there is a Fixes: line in next that doesn't refer to an ancestor.
I am using Greg's/Stephen's scripts in commit hooks:
https://github.com/krzk/tools/blob/master/linux/git-hooks-post-commit
https://github.com/krzk/tools/blob/master/linux/verify_fixes.sh
Happy to receive more ideas during:
https://lpc.events/event/17/contributions/1498/
Best regards,
Krzysztof
