Hi Yue,
On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 09:23:18PM +0800, Yue Haibing wrote:
> commit 0d297df03890 ("ARM: s3c: simplify platform code") left behind
> s3c_i2c(*)_set_platdata().
> commit d78c16ccde96 ("ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove remaining legacy code")
> leave s5p_i2c_hdmiphy_set_platdata() declaration.
> And commit bad1e6aadd17 ("ARM: SAMSUNG: Cleanup plat-samsung/devs.c and devs.h")
> leave s3c_i2c(*)_cfg_gpio() alone.
I don't understand anything from the commit message here.
How about:
"
After some cleanups[*] certain s3c_i2c(*)_cfg_gpio() prototypes
have become unused. Remove them.
[*] 0d297df03890 ("ARM: s3c: simplify platform code")
d78c16ccde96 ("ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove remaining legacy code")
bad1e6aadd17 ("ARM: SAMSUNG: Cleanup plat-samsung/devs.c and devs.h")
"
> Signed-off-by: Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxxx>
which branch should this go? Samsung or i2c?
Andi
