[Dropped Phil Edworthy from recipents as his email address has problems]
Hello,
On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 10:51:37PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> this series convers the drivers below drivers/i2c to the .remove_new()
> callback of struct platform_driver(). The motivation is to make the
> remove callback less prone for errors and wrong assumptions. See commit
> 5c5a7680e67b ("platform: Provide a remove callback that returns no
> value") for a more detailed rationale.
>
> All but one driver already returned zero unconditionally in their
> .remove() callback, so converting them to .remove_new() is trivial.
> i2c-davinci has two patches in this series, first the error path is
> improved to not return an error code, then it's converted as the others
> drivers are.
>
> The two davinci patches are also the only interdependency in this
> series. I was unsure if I should split the series in two, the busses and
> the mux changes; if convenient these can be applied independent of each
> other.
I wonder how this series will go in. My expectation was that Wolfram
picks up the whole series via his tree?!
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
