On 27/02/2023 17:27, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > >> From: Markuss Broks <markuss.broks@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> [ Upstream commit 5d5aa219a790d61cad2c38e1aa32058f16ad2f0b ] >> >> For some reason, the driver adding support for Exynos5420 MIPI phy >> back in 2016 wasn't used on Exynos5420, which caused a kernel panic. >> Add the proper compatible for it. > > This is likely bad idea for 4.14, as that compatible is still in use: I don't understand this. What does it mean? That compatible was used and still is used somewhere... Just because incorrect compatible is used somewhere is not really related whether it should be (or not) replaced with correct compatible. BTW you mentioned v4.14 but AUTOSEL is for v4.19. > > drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos-mipi-video.c: .compatible = "samsung,s5pv210-mipi-video-phy", > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi: compatible = "samsung,s5pv210-mipi-video-phy"; > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi: compatible = "samsung,s5pv210-mipi-video-phy"; > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi: compatible = "samsung,s5pv210-mipi-video-phy"; > > phy-exynos-mipi-video.c lists other compatibles, too, but with > different data. Best regards, Krzysztof
