Re: [PATCH v6 01/17] dt-bindings: display: rockchip: convert rockchip-lvds.txt to YAML

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Am Freitag, 3. Februar 2023, 20:02:54 CET schrieb Johan Jonker:
> 
> On 2/3/23 19:21, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 03:22:14PM +0100, Johan Jonker wrote:
> >> Convert rockchip-lvds.txt to YAML.
> >>
> >> Changed:
> >>   Add power-domains property.
> >>   Requirements between PX30 and RK3288
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Changed V3:
> >>   Filename matching compatible style
> >>   Drop "Regulator phandle for "
> >>   Specify properties and requirements per SoC
> >>   Sort order and restyle
> >>
> >> Changed V2:
> >>   Fix title
> >> ---
> >>  .../display/rockchip/rockchip,lvds.yaml       | 170 ++++++++++++++++++
> >>  .../display/rockchip/rockchip-lvds.txt        |  92 ----------
> >>  2 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)
> >>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip,lvds.yaml
> >>  delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-lvds.txt
> > 
> 
> > What's the plan for these patches? Don't see them in linux-next still. 
> > Do you want me to take patches 1-8?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The display patches normally go through the DRM git.
> Patch 2 must merge with grf.yaml.
> Heiko has merged now 3 PHY related patches to grf.yaml first.
> 
> [PATCH v6 02/17] dt-bindings: soc: rockchip: grf: add rockchip,lvds.yaml
> 
> See current
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mmind/linux-rockchip.git/log/?h=for-next&qt=grep&q=jonker
> 
> Not sure what Heiko's plans are.
> Patch 2 replaces  only a description text and some accolades removal, so not "too" important.
> 
> I urgent then you could merge without conflict:
> 1, 3-8

So I've applied patches 1-7 to the drm-tree now.

For the GRF-patch, I've dropped the quotes changes, as they are somewhat
unrelated to the lvds inclusion and so prevented any conflicts when applying
the rest to the DRM tree.

@Rob, if you could pick the fusb302 patch (number8), that would be great

Thanks
Heiko





[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]    
  • [Linux on Unisoc (RDA Micro) SoCs]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  •   Powered by Linux