Re: [RESEND PATCH v11 13/18] drm: exynos: dsi: Add Exynos based host irq hooks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 7:23 PM Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 1/25/23 07:54, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 2:54 AM Jagan Teki <jagan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 2:54 AM Jagan Teki <jagan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 2:42 AM Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 1/24/23 22:01, Jagan Teki wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 2:18 AM Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 1/23/23 16:12, Jagan Teki wrote:
> >>>>>>> Enable and disable of te_gpio's are Exynos platform specific
> >>>>>>> irq handling, so add the exynos based irq operations and hook
> >>>>>>> them for exynos plat_data.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If this is just an optional generic GPIO IRQ, why not keep it in the
> >>>>>> core code ? TE (tearing enable?) should be available on MX8M too.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So far the discussion (since from initial versions) with Marek
> >>>>> Szyprowski, seems to be available in Exynos. So, I keep it separate
> >>>>> from the DSIM core.
> >>>>
> >>>> Isn't TE a generic GPIO IRQ ? If so, it is available also on i.MX8M .
> >>
> >> I will check this.
> >
> > In order to use TE_GPIO we need te handler implementation, right now
> > Exynos CRTC DRM drivers have implementation for this. That is the main
> > reason to keep the TE_GPIO handling in exynos, maybe if we handle that
> > generically then it is a viable option to move TE_GPIO to the DSIM
> > core.
>
> I think you can do this exactly the same way exynos does it -- check
> whether te_handler() callback is implemented by the glue code (the one
> you already have for various exynos and imx8mm/imx8mm SoCs) and if so,
> call it. If it is not implemented, do not call anything in the TE IRQ
> handler.

I need to understand how i.MX8MM handles this on TE IRQ in the DSIM
host side, Can I do this in future patch set as it might involve
bindings changes as well if it's part of DSIM?

Jagan.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]    
  • [Linux on Unisoc (RDA Micro) SoCs]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  •   Powered by Linux