On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 4:24 AM Jagan Teki <jagan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 6:29 PM Jagan Teki <jagan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > This series supports common bridge support for Samsung MIPI DSIM > > which is used in Exynos and i.MX8MM SoC's. > > > > The final bridge supports both the Exynos and i.MX8M Mini/Nano/Plus. > > > > Patch 0001 - 0004: adding devm_drm_of_dsi_get_bridge > > > > Patch 0005 - 0006: optional PHY, PMS_P offset > > > > Patch 0007 : introduce hw_type > > > > Patch 0008 : fixing host init > > > > Patch 0009 : atomic_check > > > > Patch 0010 : input_bus_flags > > > > Patch 0011 : atomic_get_input_bus_fmts > > > > Patch 0012 - 0013: component vs bridge > > > > Patch 0014 : DSIM bridge > > > > Patch 0015 - 0016: i.MX8M Mini/Nano > > > > Patch 0017 - 0018: i.MX8M Plus > > > > Changes for v10: > > - rebase on drm-misc-next > > - add drm_of_dsi_find_panel_or_bridge > > - add devm_drm_of_dsi_get_bridge > > - fix host initialization (Thanks to Marek Szyprowski) > > - rearrange the tiny patches for easy to review > > - update simple names for enum hw_type > > - add is_hw_exynos macro > > - rework on commit messages > > > > Changes for v9: > > - rebase on drm-misc-next > > - drop drm bridge attach fix for Exynos > > - added prepare_prev_first flag > > - added pre_enable_prev_first flag > > - fix bridge chain order for exynos > > - added fix for Exynos host init for first DSI transfer > > - added MEDIA_BUS_FMT_FIXED > > - return MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X24 output_fmt if supported output_fmt > > list is unsupported. > > - added MEDIA_BUS_FMT_YUYV10_1X20 > > - added MEDIA_BUS_FMT_YUYV12_1X24 > > > > Changes for v8: > > * fixed comment lines > > * fixed commit messages > > * fixed video mode bits > > * collect Marek Ack > > * fixed video mode bit names > > * update input formats logic > > * added imx8mplus support > > > > Changes for v7: > > * fix the drm bridge attach chain for exynos drm dsi driver > > * fix the hw_type checking logic > > > > Changes for v6: > > * handle previous bridge for exynos dsi while attaching bridge > > > > Changes for v5: > > * bridge changes to support multi-arch > > * updated and clear commit messages > > * add hw_type via plat data > > * removed unneeded quirk > > * rebased on linux-next > > > > Changes for v4: > > * include Inki Dae in MAINTAINERS > > * remove dsi_driver probe in exynos_drm_drv to support multi-arch build > > * update init handling to ensure host init done on first cmd transfer > > > > Changes for v3: > > * fix the mult-arch build > > * fix dsi host init > > * updated commit messages > > > > Changes for v2: > > * fix bridge handling > > * fix dsi host init > > * correct the commit messages > > > > Tested in Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini SoM. > > > > Repo: > > https://gitlab.com/openedev/kernel/-/commits/imx8mm-dsi-v10 > > > > v9: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221209152343.180139-1-jagan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > Any inputs? > > Jagan. > > > > Jagan Teki (16): > > drm: of: Lookup if child node has DSI panel or bridge > > drm: bridge: panel: Add devm_drm_of_dsi_get_bridge helper > > drm: exynos: dsi: Drop explicit call to bridge detach > > drm: exynos: dsi: Switch to devm_drm_of_dsi_get_bridge > > drm: exynos: dsi: Mark PHY as optional > > drm: exynos: dsi: Add platform PLL_P (PMS_P) offset > > drm: exynos: dsi: Introduce hw_type platform data > > drm: exynos: dsi: Add atomic check > > drm: exynos: dsi: Add input_bus_flags > > drm: exynos: dsi: Add atomic_get_input_bus_fmts > > drm: exynos: dsi: Consolidate component and bridge > > drm: exynos: dsi: Add Exynos based host irq hooks > > drm: bridge: Generalize Exynos-DSI driver into a Samsung DSIM bridge > > dt-bindings: display: exynos: dsim: Add NXP i.MX8M Mini/Nano support > > drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Add i.MX8M Mini/Nano support > > dt-bindings: display: exynos: dsim: Add NXP i.MX8M Plus support > > > > Marek Szyprowski (1): > > drm: exynos: dsi: Handle proper host initialization > > > > Marek Vasut (1): > > drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Add i.MX8M Plus support > > Does anyone have any other comments on this? I would like to send v11 > with a few nits on v10. Please let me know. I got it working on an LVDS display that I have, but I didn't get it working on the HDMI bridge. Since we have a few tested-by people, it'd be nice to see this integrated so we can work on ading more functionality adam > > Thanks, > Jagan.
