RE: ExynosAutov9 SDAK UFS phy dtbs check error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




>-----Original Message-----
>From: Krzysztof Kozlowski [mailto:krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2022 3:25 PM
>To: Chanho Park <chanho61.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Alim Akhtar
><alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>Cc: linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: ExynosAutov9 SDAK UFS phy dtbs check error
>
>On 06/07/2022 11:53, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Hi Chanho,
>>
>> When running dtbs_check I found:
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov9-sadk.dtb: phy@17e04000: clocks:
>> [[10]] is too short
>>
>> 	From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung,ufs-
>phy.yaml
>>
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov9-sadk.dtb: phy@17e04000:
>> clock-names: ['ref_clk'] is too short
>>
>> 	From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung,ufs-
>phy.yaml
>>
>>
>> and so on. It seems you miss there clocks.
>
>+Cc Alim.
>
Thanks Krzysztof adding me and for reporting.

>Tesla FSD has the same problem:
>tesla/fsd-evb.dtb: ufs-phy@15124000: clocks: [[35, 2]] is too short
>
We need to update the binding for the newer SoCs which does not have PHY-(rx,tx)-symbol-clocks.
Phy-ref clock is only required for all the SoC and based on the SoC compatible phy-{rx,tx}-symoble clocks can be selected. 

>
>Best regards,
>Krzysztof





[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]    
  • [Linux on Unisoc (RDA Micro) SoCs]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  •   Powered by Linux