On 24/01/2022 14:50, Sam Protsenko wrote: > On Sun, 23 Jan 2022 at 21:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski > <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 22/01/2022 13:38, Sam Protsenko wrote: >>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 at 18:53, Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 8:07 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 4:11 PM Sam Protsenko >>>>> <semen.protsenko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 at 13:30, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Olof, Arnd, >>>>>> >>>>>> Just want to check if it's possible for those patches to be applied in >>>>>> v5.17? Sorry for the noise, but that's important to me. >>>>> >>>>> I can see that Olof merged merged this into the "arm/late" branch in >>>>> the soc tree, >>>>> so I assume he still plans to send it in the next few days. >>>> >>>> Yep, will be sent up today most likely. >>>> >>> >>> Thanks for detailed answer! Glad to hear it's still a possibility. >>> Please let me know if you need any actions on my side (like rebasing, >>> etc). >>> >>>>> With the timing over Christmas, I sent out the large bulk of the >>>>> contents (anything >>>>> I merged before Dec 23) last year, and Linus already merged it, the rest ended >>>>> up in the "late" branch. >>>>> >>>>> As usual, there is no guarantee that late changes make it in, but I have seen >>>>> no indication of any problems so far. >>>> >>>> Correct. Been sitting on it for a while in case there were fixes >>>> coming in for the first pieces that got merged, but in traditional >>>> fashion I'm guessing those will start to show up a few days after the >>>> late branch gets merged. :) >> >> Olof, >> v5.17-rc1 came earlier, so I see this part did not make into it. Is >> there a chance for a past-rc1 pull to Linus with it? >> >> Sam, >> Anyway the patches wont' get lost (you mentioned such worry in previous >> email to me). They might just need to wait. Unfortunately if patch, >> especially with new feature, is coming in the end of cycle, there is a >> risk it won't make it. The patches have to wait a few days in my trees >> before I send them to Arnd/Olof, so if the patch is coming after rc6, I >> can push it to Arnd/Olof around rc7, you see there is very little time. >> > > Should I send the patch fixing hard-coded clock numbers though? I > remember you said I should send it once -rc1 is out. But now that dts > patches are not merged in mainline, I'm not sure it can still be > applied? Yeah, please wait. We have few patches following that pull-request, so it will be actually easier not to merge it to soc-tree but resend soon with the follow-ups. Best regards, Krzysztof
