On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 at 17:53, Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 8:07 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 4:11 PM Sam Protsenko > > <semen.protsenko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 at 13:30, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Olof, Arnd, > > > > > > Just want to check if it's possible for those patches to be applied in > > > v5.17? Sorry for the noise, but that's important to me. > > > > I can see that Olof merged merged this into the "arm/late" branch in > > the soc tree, > > so I assume he still plans to send it in the next few days. > > Yep, will be sent up today most likely. > > > With the timing over Christmas, I sent out the large bulk of the > > contents (anything > > I merged before Dec 23) last year, and Linus already merged it, the rest ended > > up in the "late" branch. > > > > As usual, there is no guarantee that late changes make it in, but I have seen > > no indication of any problems so far. > > Correct. Been sitting on it for a while in case there were fixes > coming in for the first pieces that got merged, but in traditional > fashion I'm guessing those will start to show up a few days after the > late branch gets merged. :) Actually I have such, but to prepare a pull with them, I would need to base it on some random Linus' commit, not on v5.17-rc1. Therefore I wait for v5.17-rc1. Would you prefer different approach? Best regards, Krzysztof
