Re: [PATCH v2 14/16] arm64: dts: fsd: Add initial device tree support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 18/01/2022 15:48, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> Add initial device tree support for "Full Self-Driving" (FSD) SoC
> This SoC contain three clusters of four cortex-a72 CPUs and various
> peripheral IPs.
> 
> Cc: linux-fsd@xxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Arjun K V <arjun.kv@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Aswani Reddy <aswani.reddy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ajay Kumar <ajaykumar.rs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sriranjani P <sriranjani.p@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Chandrasekar R <rcsekar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Shashank Prashar <s.prashar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS                           |   8 +
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms          |   7 +
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/Makefile          |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/tesla/Makefile    |   3 +
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/tesla/fsd-evb.dts |  39 ++
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/tesla/fsd.dtsi    | 651 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  6 files changed, 709 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/tesla/Makefile
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/tesla/fsd-evb.dts
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/tesla/fsd.dtsi
> 

I saw you dropped the MCT timer from DTSI. I wonder why?

Not very happy with FSD naming (as discussed before), but board
compatible looks reasonable. Code looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Similarly to previous vendor-prefix patch, please let me know if it's
expected me to take it. I assume no. :)


Best regards,
Krzysztof



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]    
  • [Linux on Unisoc (RDA Micro) SoCs]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  •   Powered by Linux