On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 14:32:12 +0100 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 13/01/2022 13:11, Alim Akhtar wrote: > > This patch adds a new compatible string for exynos's ADC-V3 variant. > > > > Cc: linux-fsd@xxxxxxxxx > > Signed-off-by: Tamseel Shams <m.shams@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx> Please cc linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for next version... > > --- > > .../devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/samsung,exynos-adc.yaml | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/samsung,exynos-adc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/samsung,exynos-adc.yaml > > index 81c87295912c..9303053759ca 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/samsung,exynos-adc.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/samsung,exynos-adc.yaml > > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ properties: > > enum: > > - samsung,exynos-adc-v1 # Exynos5250 > > - samsung,exynos-adc-v2 > > + - samsung,exynos-adc-v3 > > Please use SoC-specific compatible. IP block versions are tricky because: > 1. Documentation/datasheet mentioning which SoC has which block version > are not public. > 2. Neither are public the datasheets for ADC blocks. > 3. The versioning of IP blocks can be inaccurate. > > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
