On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 at 18:44, Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This series adds CMU_CMGP clock domain to Exynos850 clock driver. In > particular it needs to enable HSI2C (High-Speed I2C) nodes. This series > depends on CMU_APM series [1]. > > Tested via /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary: > > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< cut here >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > enable prepare protect > clock count count count rate > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > clk_rco_cmgp 0 0 0 49152000 > oscclk 1 1 0 26000000 > mout_cmgp_adc 0 0 0 26000000 > ... > gout_clkcmu_cmgp_bus 1 1 0 399750000 > gout_cmgp_usi1_pclk 0 0 0 399750000 > gout_cmgp_usi0_pclk 0 0 0 399750000 > gout_gpio_cmgp_pclk 0 0 0 399750000 > dout_cmgp_adc 0 0 0 28553572 > mout_cmgp_usi1 0 0 0 399750000 > dout_cmgp_usi1 0 0 0 199875000 > gout_cmgp_usi1_ipclk 0 0 0 199875000 > mout_cmgp_usi0 0 0 0 399750000 > dout_cmgp_usi0 0 0 0 199875000 > gout_cmgp_usi0_ipclk 0 0 0 199875000 > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< cut here >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/10/22/979 > > Sam Protsenko (2): > dt-bindings: clock: samsung: Document Exynos850 CMU_CMGP > clk: samsung: exynos850: Implement CMU_CMGP domain > > .../clock/samsung,exynos850-clock.yaml | 19 ++++ > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos850.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++ > include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos850.h | 17 +++ > 3 files changed, 136 insertions(+) > > -- Hi Sylwester, Can you please review my patches I've submitted recently? Those are: - [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: samsung: Document Exynos850 CMU_APM - [PATCH 2/2] clk: samsung: exynos850: Implement CMU_APM domain - [PATCH 1/1] clk: samsung: exynos850: Register clocks early - [PATCH 0/2] clk: samsung: exynos850: Implement CMU_CMGP - [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: samsung: Document Exynos850 CMU_CMGP - [PATCH 2/2] clk: samsung: exynos850: Implement CMU_CMGP domain My further series (like device tree patches for new dev board support) depend on the status of above patches. So it'd great if those can be reviewed and applied if it's feasible. Thanks! > 2.30.2 >
