Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] dt-bindings: clock: Document Exynos850 CMU bindings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12.10.2021 10:13, Sam Protsenko wrote:
On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 at 13:42, Sylwester Nawrocki<s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
On 11.10.2021 12:13, Sam Protsenko wrote:
On Sat, 9 Oct 2021 at 23:41, Sylwester Nawrocki<snawrocki@xxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
On 08.10.2021 17:43, Sam Protsenko wrote:
Provide dt-schema documentation for Exynos850 SoC clock controller.

Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko<semen.protsenko@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski<krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi<cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
[...]
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/samsung,exynos850-clock.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,185 @@
[...]
+
+title: Samsung Exynos850 SoC clock controller
+
+maintainers:
+  - Sam Protsenko<semen.protsenko@xxxxxxxxxx>
+  - Chanwoo Choi<cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
+  - Krzysztof Kozlowski<krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+  - Sylwester Nawrocki<s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx>
+  - Tomasz Figa<tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx>
+
+description: |
+  Exynos850 clock controller is comprised of several CMU units, generating
+  clocks for different domains. Those CMU units are modeled as separate device
+  tree nodes, and might depend on each other. Root clocks in that clock tree are
+  two external clocks:: OSCCLK (26 MHz) and RTCCLK (32768 Hz). Those external
+  clocks must be defined as fixed-rate clocks in dts.
+
+  CMU_TOP is a top-level CMU, where all base clocks are prepared using PLLs and
+  dividers; all other leaf clocks (other CMUs) are usually derived from CMU_TOP.
+
+  Each clock is assigned an identifier and client nodes can use this identifier
+  to specify the clock which they consume. All clocks that available for usage

s/All clocks that available/All clocks available ?
No need to resend, I can amend it when applying.

Yeah, not a native speaker, I tend to do such mistakes sometimes:)
Please fix when applying.

Btw, I can see that you already applied 3 out of 5 patches from this
patch series here: [1]. Can you please also apply the rest, or is
there any outstanding comments that I missed?
The patches look good to me, I just wanted to allow some for Rob to have
a look and provide an Ack.

Can you please review this one?

The binding is rather straightforward so I applied the patch now, thank you.






[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]    
  • [Linux on Unisoc (RDA Micro) SoCs]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  •   Powered by Linux