Hi, Thanks for your review. > -----Original Message----- > From: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@xxxxxxx> > Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2021 9:12 PM > To: Chanho Park <chanho61.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Alim Akhtar > <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx>; James E . J . Bottomley <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; > Martin K . Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>; Krzysztof Kozlowski > <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Bean Huo <beanhuo@xxxxxxxxxx>; Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>; > Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>; hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Can Guo > <cang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jaehoon Chung > <jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Gyunghoon Kwon <goodjob.kwon@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Sowon > Na <sowon.na@xxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 07/16] scsi: ufs: ufs-exynos: correct timeout value > setting registers > > > > > PA_PWRMODEUSERDATA0 -> DL_FC0PROTTIMEOUTVAL > > PA_PWRMODEUSERDATA1 -> DL_TC0REPLAYTIMEOUTVAL > > PA_PWRMODEUSERDATA2 -> DL_AFC0REQTIMEOUTVAL > Is there a specific reason why this fix is part of the exynosauto series? I found the issue when I made the patches with some refactoring of ufs-exynos driver. I can send it separately. Best Regards, Chanho Park
