Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] regulator/mfd/clock: dt-bindings: Samsung S2M and S5M to dtschema

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 05 Oct 2021, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 11:40:56AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 
> > Merging/dependencies
> > ====================
> > 1. Regulator related binding changes depend on first two commits (the
> >    fixes), because of context.
> > 2. The mfd bindings depend on clock and regulator bindings.
> > 
> > The fixes and bindings changes (patches 1-10) should go via the same
> > tree.  For example regulator or mfd tree.  I propose the regulator tree,
> > since it will have also one driver change (the fix, first commit).
> 
> Lee, Stephen, Michael does Krzysztof's plan make sense to you?

I tend to take cross subsystem patches.  MFD is usually in the centre
of these scenarios and I have tooling to easily set-up immutable
branches/pull-requests.

Always happy to discuss if others have different/better ideas though.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]    
  • [Linux on Unisoc (RDA Micro) SoCs]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  •   Powered by Linux