On 30/09/2021 14:39, Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 30 Sep 2021, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On 30/09/2021 11:23, Lee Jones wrote: >>> [0] Full disclosure: part of my role at Linaro is to keep the Android >>> kernel running as close to Mainline as possible and encourage/push the >>> upstream-first mantra, hence my involvement with this and other sets. >>> I assure you all intentions are good and honourable. If you haven't >>> already seen it, please see Todd's most recent update on the goals and >>> status of GKI: >>> >>> Article: https://tinyurl.com/saaen3sp >>> Video: https://youtu.be/O_lCFGinFPM >>> >> >> Side topic, why this patchset is in your scope or Will's/Google's scope? >> Just drop it from Android main kernel, it will not be your problem. I >> mean, really, you don't need this patchset in your tree at all. The only >> platform which needs it, the only platform which will loose something >> will be one specific vendor. Therefore this will be an incentive for >> them to join both discussions and upstream development. :) > > How would they fix this besides upstreaming support for unreleased > work-in-progress H/W? > > Haven't I explained this several times already? :) Either that way or the same as Will's doing but that's not my question. I understand you flush the queue of your GKI patches to be closer to upstream. Reduce the backlog/burden. you can achieve your goal by simply dropping such patch and making it not your problem. :) Best regards, Krzysztof
