Re: [PATCH 57/78] media: exynos4-is: use pm_runtime_resume_and_get()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 26.04.2021 15:12, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Sun, 25 Apr 2021 22:57:25 +0200
Sylwester Nawrocki <snawrocki@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:

On 24.04.2021 08:45, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Commit dd8088d5a896 ("PM: runtime: Add pm_runtime_resume_and_get to deal with usage counter")
added pm_runtime_resume_and_get() in order to automatically handle
dev->power.usage_count decrement on errors.

Use the new API, in order to cleanup the error check logic.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-is.c b/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-is.c
index 972d9601d236..bca35866cc74 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-is.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-is.c
@@ -828,7 +828,7 @@ static int fimc_is_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
   			goto err_irq;
   	}
- ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
   	if (ret < 0)
   		goto err_pm;

It seems you intended to use err_suspend label here. We don't need
a new label though, instead of err_pm we can jump to err_irq when
pm_runtime_resume_and_get() fails.

Thanks! Will fix at the next version.

Note that when runtime PM is
disabled pm_runtime_resume_and_get() always returns 0.

Ok, but there are a couple of conditions at rpm_resume() function
at drivers/base/power/runtime.c (which is the code that actually
handles those PM macros) that could make it to return errors,
which are independent on the PM callbacks, like those:

         if (dev->power.runtime_error)
                 retval = -EINVAL;
         else if (dev->power.disable_depth > 0)
                 retval = -EACCES;

and more might be added as the PM core changes.

Right, I looked only at !CONFIG_PM case, this is what the "if (!pm_runtime_enabled(dev))"
test and explicit fimc_is_runtime_{resume,suspend} calls were originally for.
Agreed, better not to rely too much on internal implementation as there is
no specific guarantees about return value at the API documentation.

Regards,
Sylwester

@@ -862,6 +862,7 @@ static int fimc_is_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
   	fimc_is_unregister_subdevs(is);
   err_pm:
   	pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev);
+err_suspend:
   	if (!pm_runtime_enabled(dev))
   		fimc_is_runtime_suspend(dev);
   err_irq:




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]    
  • [Linux on Unisoc (RDA Micro) SoCs]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  •   Powered by Linux