On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 05:36:35PM +0100, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > On 11/19/20 17:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > So far all Exynos, S3C64xx and S5Pv210 clock units were selected by > > respective SOC/ARCH Kconfig option. On a kernel built for selected > > SoCs, this allowed to build only limited set of matching clock drivers. > > However compile testing was not possible in such case as Makefile object > > depent on SOC/ARCH option. > > "objects depend" or "object depends" ? "object depends" > > > Add separate Kconfig options for each of them to be able to compile > > test. > > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski<krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> > > The patch look good to me, thanks. > Acked-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > I guess it's best now to merge it through your tree as it depends on > patches already sent to arm-soc? Next time it might be better to use > immutable branches right away to keep the clk changes in the clk > maintainer's tree. At that time I had only one clk patch so I did not put it on separate branch. Anyway, this does not depend on the clkout patches and only minor patch adjustement is needed. Cherry-pick can solve it (you would need to apply on next/master and then cherry pick) or I can resend you one rebased on linus/master. There should be no conflicts when merging later into next or linus. I propose you should take it via clk tree. Best regards, Krzysztof