Hi Georgi, Chanwoo,
On 13.11.2020 10:07, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> On 11/13/20 5:48 PM, Georgi Djakov wrote:
>> On 11/12/20 16:09, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
[...]
>>
>> Good work Sylwester! Thank you and all the reviewers! What would be the merge
>> path for this patchset? Looks like there is no build dependency between patches.
>> Should i take just patches 2,3 or also patch 1? Chanwoo?
>
> Hi Georgi,
>
> If you take the patch 2,3, I'll apply patch 1,4 to devfreq.git.
> Hi Sylwester,
> First of all, thanks for your work to finish it for a long time.
> I'm very happy about finishing this work. It is very necessary feature
> for the QoS. Once again, thank for your work.
I would also like to thank everyone for provided feedback!
As far as building is concerned the patches could be applied in any
order. I think we could also apply the drm/exynos patch in same
merge window. There could be runtime (or git bisect) regression
only in case when INTERCONNECT is enabled and only (or as first)
the dts and drm/exynos patches are applied.
Hmm, maybe it's better to hold on with the drm patch, INTERCONNECT
is disabled in arch/arm/configs/{multi_v7_defconfig, exynos_defconfig}
but it is enabled in arch/arm64/configs/defconfig.
--
Regards,
Sylwester
