On 11/6/20 4:42 PM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi Viresh,
>
> On 11/6/20 4:03 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> The dev_pm_opp_put_*() APIs now accepts a NULL opp_table pointer and so
>> there is no need for us to carry the extra check. Drop them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c | 12 ++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
>> index 1e684a448c9e..143fd58ec3dc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
>> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
>> @@ -158,10 +158,8 @@ static void exynos_bus_exit(struct device *dev)
>>
>> dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
>> clk_disable_unprepare(bus->clk);
>> - if (bus->opp_table) {
>> - dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table);
>> - bus->opp_table = NULL;
>> - }
>> + dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table);
>> + bus->opp_table = NULL;
>> }
>>
>> static void exynos_bus_passive_exit(struct device *dev)
>> @@ -444,10 +442,8 @@ static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
>> clk_disable_unprepare(bus->clk);
>> err_reg:
>> - if (!passive) {
>> - dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table);
>> - bus->opp_table = NULL;
>> - }
>> + dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(bus->opp_table);
>> + bus->opp_table = NULL;
>>
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>
> Applied it. Thanks.
>
It seems that this patch depends on first patch.
So, need to be merged to one git repository.
Instead of applying it to devfreq.git,
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
--
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics
