Hi Krzysztof,
On 01.09.2020 09:54, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The SATA PHY in Exynos5250 SoCs has two interfaces and two device nodes:
> 1. sata-phy@12170000
> 2. i2c-9/i2c@38
>
> The first node represents the actual SATA PHY device with phy-cells.
> The second represents additional I2C interface, needed by the driver
> to communicate with the SATA PHY device. It is not a PHY-provider in
> the terms of dtschema so rename it to silence dtbs_check warning:
>
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dt.yaml: sata-phy@38: '#phy-cells' is a required property
> From schema: lib/python3.6/site-packages/dtschema/schemas/phy/phy-provider.yaml
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
> index f2bcce167b2d..3c401c82905c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
> @@ -544,7 +544,7 @@
> samsung,i2c-max-bus-freq = <40000>;
> samsung,i2c-slave-addr = <0x38>;
>
> - sata_phy_i2c: sata-phy@38 {
> + sata_phy_i2c: sata-phy-i2c@38 {
> compatible = "samsung,exynos-sataphy-i2c";
> reg = <0x38>;
> };
I'm not against the rename, but frankly, the above node and all i2c
parameters should be moved to exynos5250.dtsi. This is a SoC internal
things (the same way as hdmiphy in exynos4.dtsi), so the board dts
should only contain information like status = "enabled" for i2c_8 and
hdmi_i2c_phy nodes. No need to duplicate it here and in smdk5250.dts.
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
