On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 at 08:31, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 at 19:17, Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi Krzysztof, > > > > On 8/17/20 4:50 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 04:34:20PM +0100, Lukasz Luba wrote: > > >> The interrupts in Dynamic Memory Controller in Exynos5422 and Odroid > > >> XU3-family boards are no longer needed. They have been used in order > > >> to workaround some issues in scheduled work in devfreq. Now when the > > >> devfreq framework design is improved, remove the interrupt driven > > >> approach and rely on devfreq monitoring mechanism with fixed intervals. > > >> > > >> Reported-by: Willy Wolff <willy.mh.wolff.ml@xxxxxxxxx> > > >> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx> > > >> --- > > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 3 --- > > >> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > I think the dependencies were merged so this can be safely applied > > > without bisectability problems? > > > > I have created v2 of that fix and it got merged > > via Chanwoo's tree, the commit 4fc9a0470d2dc37028 > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/7/10/1048 > > > > That commit switched the driver default mode from 'irq driven' to > > new devfreq monitoring mechanism. Furthermore, when the driver is > > built as a module, you can try to use the 'irq mode', but for this > > you would need the DT IRQs description (this $subject tries to remove). > > > > I would like to keep this IRQ mode for experimentation, as I > > described in answers to Bartek's questions: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/7/14/315 > > > > Unfortunately, I am quite busy and won't make any progress before the > > LPC. > > None of these were the actual answer to my question, unless by "v2 of > that fix and it got merged" means the dependencies? > > I'll drop it from the queue. Please resend if it is valid. Agh, not drop, I mean postpone for the next cycle (this is v5.11). Best regards, Krzysztof
