On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 09:46, Anand Moon <linux.amoon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This reverts commit 07f6842341abe978e6375078f84506ec3280ece5. > > Since SCLK_SCLK_USBD300 suspend clock need to be configured > for phy module, I wrongly mapped this clock to DWC3 code. > > Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-exynos.c | 9 --------- > 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-) But why was this patch applied in the first place? It did not pass the review. For the v3 I replied: "This patchset should not be applied. As of now, it is not needed and not justified." There were no acks and no positive reviews. My comments from previous versions of this patchset were not properly addressed. So here - yes, makes sense to revert it as it should have never been applied. Best regards, Krzysztof
