[PATCH] memory/samsung: Maybe wrong triming parameter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In function create_timings_aligned, all the max is to use
dmc->min_tck->xxx, aligned with val dmc->timings->xxx.
But the dmc->timings->tFAW use dmc->min_tck->tXP?
Maybe this point is wrong parameter useing.

Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao <bernard@xxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c b/drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c
index 81a1b1d01683..22a43d662833 100644
--- a/drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c
+++ b/drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c
@@ -1091,7 +1091,7 @@ static int create_timings_aligned(struct exynos5_dmc *dmc, u32 *reg_timing_row,
 	/* power related timings */
 	val = dmc->timings->tFAW / clk_period_ps;
 	val += dmc->timings->tFAW % clk_period_ps ? 1 : 0;
-	val = max(val, dmc->min_tck->tXP);
+	val = max(val, dmc->min_tck->tFAW);
 	reg = &timing_power[0];
 	*reg_timing_power |= TIMING_VAL2REG(reg, val);
 
-- 
2.26.2




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]    
  • [Linux on Unisoc (RDA Micro) SoCs]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  •   Powered by Linux