RE: [PATCH 0/6] Kill setup_irq()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-hexagon-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <linux-hexagon-
> owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of afzal mohammed
> Sent: Friday, March 27, 2020 11:08 AM
> To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; x86@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linuxppc-
> dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-parisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-m68k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-hexagon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-c6x-dev@linux-
> c6x.org; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [PATCH 0/6] Kill setup_irq()
...
> Note 1: sh toolchain is available, but that will not make the  relevant
changes
> compile as it has dependency of 64bit arch toolchain,  did try a Kconfig
hack
> to make it compile w/ 32bit sh toolchain, but it  failed due to other
reasons
> (unknown operands), so gave up on that.
> Note 2: hexagon final image creation fails even w/o my patch, but it  has
> been ensured that w/ my changes relevant object files are getting  built
w/o
> warnings.

Afzal,

	What's the nature of the failure in "Note 2"?

-Brian



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]    
  • [Linux on Unisoc (RDA Micro) SoCs]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  •   Powered by Linux